<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ask The Experts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com</link>
	<description>The only place to get expert advice!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Is there an industry standard on the acceptable minimum seal thickness for a rigid tray to Tyvek lidstock?</title>
		<link>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2010/03/is-there-an-industry-standard-on-the-acceptable-minimum-seal-thickness-for-a-rigid-tray-to-tyvek-lidstock/</link>
		<comments>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2010/03/is-there-an-industry-standard-on-the-acceptable-minimum-seal-thickness-for-a-rigid-tray-to-tyvek-lidstock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daphne</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Corey Hensel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[seal thickness]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tyvek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/?p=504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is no minimum seal thickness for a rigid tray in the industry.  The minimum thickness required is whatever is needed to achieve and maintain your desired strength and integrity criteria for your packaging.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2010/03/is-there-an-industry-standard-on-the-acceptable-minimum-seal-thickness-for-a-rigid-tray-to-tyvek-lidstock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We are preparing dye penetration test with 20-L HDPE carboy containing bulk drug substance. This is the first time in our company and we have no ideas how to validate the test method. Except dye penetration test, which method is easier and reliable for 20-L carboy containing DS? And please suggest the method validation.</title>
		<link>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2010/03/we-are-preparing-dye-penetration-test-with-20-l-hdpe-carboy-containing-bulk-drug-substance-this-is-the-first-time-in-our-company-and-we-have-no-ideas-how-to-validate-the-test-method-except-dye-penet/</link>
		<comments>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2010/03/we-are-preparing-dye-penetration-test-with-20-l-hdpe-carboy-containing-bulk-drug-substance-this-is-the-first-time-in-our-company-and-we-have-no-ideas-how-to-validate-the-test-method-except-dye-penet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daphne</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Corey Hensel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/?p=502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a difficult one in that there are some test methods you could use for these containers, but none of them will have been validated by ASTM because they are only guidance documents. The test is a pressure differential test, which is performed by internally pressurizing the container using water. You can reference section [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2010/03/we-are-preparing-dye-penetration-test-with-20-l-hdpe-carboy-containing-bulk-drug-substance-this-is-the-first-time-in-our-company-and-we-have-no-ideas-how-to-validate-the-test-method-except-dye-penet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I would like to use food coloring rather than Toluidine Blue dye for dye migration.  Section 5.5 of ASTM F1929 indicates that I may but must be experimentally determined, however it gives no specifics.</title>
		<link>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2010/01/i-would-like-to-use-food-coloring-rather-than-toluidine-blue-dye-for-dye-migration-section-55-of-astm-f1929-indicates-that-i-may-but-must-be-experimentally-determined-however-it-gives-no-specifics/</link>
		<comments>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2010/01/i-would-like-to-use-food-coloring-rather-than-toluidine-blue-dye-for-dye-migration-section-55-of-astm-f1929-indicates-that-i-may-but-must-be-experimentally-determined-however-it-gives-no-specifics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daphne</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Corey Hensel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[testing ASTM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/?p=498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Performing a side-by-side test method validation will give you the answers you are looking for.  Use a predetermined sample population, having both positive and negative controls within it (0.002 in per the standard for the positive controls), and testing all of the samples using both solutions per the standard.  If the results are the same, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2010/01/i-would-like-to-use-food-coloring-rather-than-toluidine-blue-dye-for-dye-migration-section-55-of-astm-f1929-indicates-that-i-may-but-must-be-experimentally-determined-however-it-gives-no-specifics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I stumbled across Ms. Allen’s blogs ( http://blog.pmpnews.com/?p=753 and http://blog.pmpnews.com/?p=720) and wondered where I could find options/approaches for doing this, do you have any ideas where to look? We are looking for tamper-evidence technologies and suppliers. We have products that are filled in hospital pharmacies, and we would like some approaches to tamper evidence application at time of filling and prior to use.</title>
		<link>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2010/01/i-stumbled-across-ms-allen%e2%80%99s-blogs-httpblogpmpnewscomp753-and-httpblogpmpnewscomp720-and-wondered-where-i-could-find-optionsapproaches-for-doing-this-do-you-have-any-idea/</link>
		<comments>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2010/01/i-stumbled-across-ms-allen%e2%80%99s-blogs-httpblogpmpnewscomp753-and-httpblogpmpnewscomp720-and-wondered-where-i-could-find-optionsapproaches-for-doing-this-do-you-have-any-idea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daphne</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Espin]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[syringes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/?p=494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a very difficult area. Every hospital and physician has very different guidelines and procedures for handling vial and syringe medication storage and administration.
There is a Pharma industry trend that is moving toward prefilled syringes and pens. Although this type of delivery system is more costly than the vial and syringe method, it will [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2010/01/i-stumbled-across-ms-allen%e2%80%99s-blogs-httpblogpmpnewscomp753-and-httpblogpmpnewscomp720-and-wondered-where-i-could-find-optionsapproaches-for-doing-this-do-you-have-any-idea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How will item-level serialization influence line automation? Once marked with a unique code, products must remain in their original order for tracking blister-to-carton-to-case relationships, so how do we handle staging areas and others where products transfer in groups?</title>
		<link>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2010/01/how-will-item-level-serialization-influence-line-automation-once-marked-with-a-unique-code-products-must-remain-in-their-original-order-for-tracking-blister-to-carton-to-case-relationships-so-how-d/</link>
		<comments>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2010/01/how-will-item-level-serialization-influence-line-automation-once-marked-with-a-unique-code-products-must-remain-in-their-original-order-for-tracking-blister-to-carton-to-case-relationships-so-how-d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 20:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daphne</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Bahr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/?p=492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are a number of variables that make a definitive answer difficult. For a complete response, we need more information on process flow and your equipment and capacities. However, here is a qualified response.
First, identify the blister(s) after introduction into the cartoner (just prior to loading). Then, print an identification on the carton based upon [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2010/01/how-will-item-level-serialization-influence-line-automation-once-marked-with-a-unique-code-products-must-remain-in-their-original-order-for-tracking-blister-to-carton-to-case-relationships-so-how-d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I would like to know what the differences are between positive and negative migration?</title>
		<link>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2010/01/i-would-like-to-know-the-differences-are-between-positive-and-negative-migration/</link>
		<comments>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2010/01/i-would-like-to-know-the-differences-are-between-positive-and-negative-migration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 23:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daphne</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Corey Hensel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[migration]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Package Testing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[vacuum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/?p=488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Positive migration would be the forcing out of atmosphere inside of a package by internally pressurizing the package (blowing it up like a balloon).  The negative migration would also be the forcing out of atmosphere from the package, but it is done by changing the atmosphere outside of the package (vacuum test simulating an [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2010/01/i-would-like-to-know-the-differences-are-between-positive-and-negative-migration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Please explain the theory behind prequalified containers and how using them influences my own validation efforts. Do I save any time or steps? Has FDA issued any statements on validating prequalified containers?</title>
		<link>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2009/12/please-explain-the-theory-behind-prequalified-containers-and-how-using-them-influences-my-own-validation-efforts-do-i-save-any-time-or-steps-has-fda-issued-any-statements-on-validating-prequalified/</link>
		<comments>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2009/12/please-explain-the-theory-behind-prequalified-containers-and-how-using-them-influences-my-own-validation-efforts-do-i-save-any-time-or-steps-has-fda-issued-any-statements-on-validating-prequalified/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daphne</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Mayer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Prequalified shippers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Shippers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[validation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/?p=485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When qualifying any thermal shipping container, the three basic steps of design qualification, operational qualification, and performance qualification outlined in PDA technical report 39 should be followed.  The design qualification step should provide documented verification that the proposed design is suitable to meet the requirements.  The operational qualification provides documentation that the design yields reproducible [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2009/12/please-explain-the-theory-behind-prequalified-containers-and-how-using-them-influences-my-own-validation-efforts-do-i-save-any-time-or-steps-has-fda-issued-any-statements-on-validating-prequalified/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What factors must be considered when selecting a thermal container for international cold chain shipments?</title>
		<link>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2009/11/what-factors-must-be-considered-when-selecting-a-thermal-container-for-international-cold-chain-shipments/</link>
		<comments>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2009/11/what-factors-must-be-considered-when-selecting-a-thermal-container-for-international-cold-chain-shipments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daphne</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Mayer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cold chain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[international shipping]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/?p=482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before potential container solutions can be considered, you must first define the shipment parameters. This is true whether you are shipping internationally or domestically. The shipment parameters will help you narrow down the vast array of thermal containers available today.  Some of the parameters that should be considered are:

 Interior temperature range (i.e. refrigerated between [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2009/11/what-factors-must-be-considered-when-selecting-a-thermal-container-for-international-cold-chain-shipments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We currently perform a peel test on our medical tray/Tyvek lid before and after each shift. Three peel tests are performed per tray from each sealing die. I would like to reduce the number of peel samples. What is the industry norm for peel tests as an in-process control?</title>
		<link>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2009/11/we-currently-perform-a-peel-test-on-our-medical-traytyvek-lid-before-and-after-each-shift-three-peel-tests-are-performed-per-tray-from-each-sealing-die-i-would-like-to-reduce-the-number-of-peel-sam/</link>
		<comments>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2009/11/we-currently-perform-a-peel-test-on-our-medical-traytyvek-lid-before-and-after-each-shift-three-peel-tests-are-performed-per-tray-from-each-sealing-die-i-would-like-to-reduce-the-number-of-peel-sam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daphne</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Corey Hensel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[peel testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/?p=478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is no industry standard, as it pertains to the number of samples required for a test.  This is based on the statistical confidence that you would like for your sealing process. My belief is that many of our customers use the sample size of ten samples for a lot-to-lot comparison.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2009/11/we-currently-perform-a-peel-test-on-our-medical-traytyvek-lid-before-and-after-each-shift-three-peel-tests-are-performed-per-tray-from-each-sealing-die-i-would-like-to-reduce-the-number-of-peel-sam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We want to start performing ASTM F1929 in house. Do you have any suggestions for making samples with known defects?  We tried placing a 0.002-in. wire between our tray and Tyvek lid, but the wire breaks and remains in place during removal instead of leaving a channel.</title>
		<link>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2009/11/we-want-to-start-performing-astm-f1929-in-house-do-you-have-any-suggestions-for-making-samples-with-known-defects-we-tried-placing-a-0002-in-wire-between-our-tray-and-tyvek-lid-but-the-wire-brea/</link>
		<comments>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2009/11/we-want-to-start-performing-astm-f1929-in-house-do-you-have-any-suggestions-for-making-samples-with-known-defects-we-tried-placing-a-0002-in-wire-between-our-tray-and-tyvek-lid-but-the-wire-brea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daphne</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Corey Hensel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ASTM F1929]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/?p=475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would suggest sticking with the 0.002-in. wire since that is the sensitivity of the standard. Perhaps there is a gage block of this size out there, which might make it easier to extract the standard from the package. We typically use a wire, however that has been used on mostly pouch samples and not [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2009/11/we-want-to-start-performing-astm-f1929-in-house-do-you-have-any-suggestions-for-making-samples-with-known-defects-we-tried-placing-a-0002-in-wire-between-our-tray-and-tyvek-lid-but-the-wire-brea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
