<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ask The Experts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com</link>
	<description>The only place to get expert advice!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 16:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Is there a good place to find data or reviews external to suppliers on packaging labels, specific to bar code durability and abrasion resistance?</title>
		<link>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2012/04/is-there-a-good-place-to-find-data-or-reviews-external-to-suppliers-on-packaging-labels-specific-to-bar-code-durability-and-abrasion-resistance/</link>
		<comments>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2012/04/is-there-a-good-place-to-find-data-or-reviews-external-to-suppliers-on-packaging-labels-specific-to-bar-code-durability-and-abrasion-resistance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 16:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daphne</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Kregg Albrecht]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[abrasion resistance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bar codes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/?p=633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This response comes from Ken Koldan of Flexcon. He pointed us to UL&#8217;s Web site for adoptions and ITW&#8217;s Extreme Solutions Guide.
&#8220;Of course, all the vendors have their own data, but UL&#8217;s and ITW&#8217;s sites do the comparisons,&#8221; Koldan says.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2012/04/is-there-a-good-place-to-find-data-or-reviews-external-to-suppliers-on-packaging-labels-specific-to-bar-code-durability-and-abrasion-resistance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I am having trouble specifying a material in which to package my sutures. I have currently used an SBS-type coated cardboard but this sheds too many particles in the cleanroom. Rather than installing and validating a cleanroom vacuum system, I am wondering how the big boys get around this? What is the cardboard that they use for their suture packets? I don’t want to have to make my packaging out of Tyvek or other heat sealing material. Any suggestions on the material we should use?</title>
		<link>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2012/03/i-am-having-trouble-specifying-a-material-in-which-to-package-my-sutures-i-have-currently-used-an-sbs-type-coated-cardboard-but-this-sheds-too-many-particles-in-the-cleanroom-rather-than-installing/</link>
		<comments>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2012/03/i-am-having-trouble-specifying-a-material-in-which-to-package-my-sutures-i-have-currently-used-an-sbs-type-coated-cardboard-but-this-sheds-too-many-particles-in-the-cleanroom-rather-than-installing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 20:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daphne</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Kregg Albrecht]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cleanroom]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[paperboard]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[suture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/?p=631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My understanding of cleanroom environments is that paper in general can be a big nuisance factor and should be avoided if at all possible.  I know that special latex impregnated paper is used even for things like notebooks in cleanrooms.
If you are intending to use general paperboard materials, then you have selected the best [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2012/03/i-am-having-trouble-specifying-a-material-in-which-to-package-my-sutures-i-have-currently-used-an-sbs-type-coated-cardboard-but-this-sheds-too-many-particles-in-the-cleanroom-rather-than-installing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How do defects in paper affect packaging?</title>
		<link>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2012/03/how-do-defects-in-paper-affect-packaging/</link>
		<comments>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2012/03/how-do-defects-in-paper-affect-packaging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daphne</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Kregg Albrecht]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Packaging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[paperboard]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[printing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/?p=629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I will respond broadly to this question covering the basics of paper and paperboard.
First, there is a need to always take a step back and ask whether the correct paper or paperboard specification/grade is being deployed.  Marrying up the correct paper that meets the fit, form, and function of the intended application is paramount.
Assuming [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2012/03/how-do-defects-in-paper-affect-packaging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How can tamper evidence and mass serialization complement one another?</title>
		<link>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2012/02/how-can-tamper-evidence-and-mass-serialization-complement-one-another/</link>
		<comments>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2012/02/how-can-tamper-evidence-and-mass-serialization-complement-one-another/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daphne</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Kregg Albrecht]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[anticounterfeiting]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[diversion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceuticals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tamper evidence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/?p=627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tamper evidence and mass serialization are complementary in that both technologies help to protect patients and secure the supply chain. However, they address completely different elements of criminal activity.
Mass serialization protects against counterfeiting and diversion, and is particularly useful against diversion. Diversion can be defined as a legitimate product in an illegitimate market. Tamper evidence [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2012/02/how-can-tamper-evidence-and-mass-serialization-complement-one-another/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Please discuss the arguments for and against random serialization.</title>
		<link>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2012/02/please-discuss-the-arguments-for-and-against-random-serialization/</link>
		<comments>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2012/02/please-discuss-the-arguments-for-and-against-random-serialization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daphne</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Kregg Albrecht]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[anticounte]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceuticals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Serialization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/?p=625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The primary driver behind serialization is patient safety. Serialization provides a safeguard from illegitimate product entering the supply chain (counterfeiting) and legitimate product entering illegitimate markets (diversion). Both random and sequential serialization are effective tools against diversion so long as you know which codes were shipped to which supply channels and that they were verified [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2012/02/please-discuss-the-arguments-for-and-against-random-serialization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should you duplicate/repeat the serial number printed on the primary package on the carton? How would this be managed?</title>
		<link>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2012/02/should-you-duplicaterepeat-the-serial-number-printed-on-the-primary-package-on-the-carton-how-would-this-be-managed/</link>
		<comments>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2012/02/should-you-duplicaterepeat-the-serial-number-printed-on-the-primary-package-on-the-carton-how-would-this-be-managed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daphne</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Kregg Albrecht]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[aggregation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceuticals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Serialization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/?p=623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The serial number should be on the outer most &#8220;layer&#8221; of packaging down to the unit of sale. This will typically be the carton or, in instances where no carton is deployed, the primary label. It would typically not be necessary to serialize both.
Please note this is different than a serial code on the corrugate [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2012/02/should-you-duplicaterepeat-the-serial-number-printed-on-the-primary-package-on-the-carton-how-would-this-be-managed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We’re thinking about automated loading of inserts. Is there a label volume or line speed after which this becomes cost justifiable?</title>
		<link>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2011/07/we%e2%80%99re-thinking-about-automated-loading-of-inserts-is-there-a-label-volume-or-line-speed-after-which-this-becomes-cost-justifiable/</link>
		<comments>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2011/07/we%e2%80%99re-thinking-about-automated-loading-of-inserts-is-there-a-label-volume-or-line-speed-after-which-this-becomes-cost-justifiable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 21:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daphne</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Bahr]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[automation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[inserts]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[labels]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[loading automated]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/?p=619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ask yourself this: what is the annualized labor cost to do this manually? Most literature feeders (vacuum or friction styles) will cost less than one full-time person for one year. This means a payback of less than one year.
If this ongoing production requires literature, it&#8217;s pretty easy to justify automatic feeding. This will also improve [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2011/07/we%e2%80%99re-thinking-about-automated-loading-of-inserts-is-there-a-label-volume-or-line-speed-after-which-this-becomes-cost-justifiable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trying to understand future requirements for Serialization on vial label and outer carton for an IV product. When will serialization be required by the FDA (Federal) and/or by the state of California? How can this be automated?</title>
		<link>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2011/03/trying-to-understand-future-requirements-for-serialization-on-vial-label-and-outer-carton-for-an-iv-product-when-will-serialization-be-required-by-the-fda-federal-andor-by-the-state-of-california/</link>
		<comments>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2011/03/trying-to-understand-future-requirements-for-serialization-on-vial-label-and-outer-carton-for-an-iv-product-when-will-serialization-be-required-by-the-fda-federal-andor-by-the-state-of-california/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 22:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daphne</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Bahr]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[automation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Packaging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceuticals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Serialization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[vial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/?p=614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to Joerg Liedtke from Laetus GmbH for helping to respond to questions 1 and 2.
1. Trying to understand future requirements for Serialization on vial label
and outer carton for an IV product&#8230;.?
A: Currently the smallest unit to be serialized is the &#8220;unit of sale.&#8221; Typically a single vial is not sold, so in your case, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2011/03/trying-to-understand-future-requirements-for-serialization-on-vial-label-and-outer-carton-for-an-iv-product-when-will-serialization-be-required-by-the-fda-federal-andor-by-the-state-of-california/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We use form-fill-seal machines and 0.015 PVC or PET packaging material. We now fabricate our own tooling but have been having problems with the heat plates. We are using 6061 T6 with hard anodization impregnated with teflon coating and our radiant heat distribution is not as even as the &#8220;store bought&#8221; plates. Both plates are alum and are coated the same. Is there another alum that will work better in this application?</title>
		<link>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2011/03/we-use-form-fill-seal-machines-and-0015-pvc-or-pet-packaging-material-we-now-fabricate-our-own-tooling-but-have-been-having-problems-with-the-heat-plates-we-are-using-6061-t6-with-hard-anodization/</link>
		<comments>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2011/03/we-use-form-fill-seal-machines-and-0015-pvc-or-pet-packaging-material-we-now-fabricate-our-own-tooling-but-have-been-having-problems-with-the-heat-plates-we-are-using-6061-t6-with-hard-anodization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 18:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daphne</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Wil Caraballo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[aluminum]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[form-fill-seal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Packaging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[PET]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[PVC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tooling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/?p=611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[6061 T6 is the type of aluminum that is typically used for heating plates and the coating that gives the best clarity when forming PET is a green spray-on Teflon coating with a clear coat over the top of it. A hard anodized coating will perform and be more durable but the heat transfer is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2011/03/we-use-form-fill-seal-machines-and-0015-pvc-or-pet-packaging-material-we-now-fabricate-our-own-tooling-but-have-been-having-problems-with-the-heat-plates-we-are-using-6061-t6-with-hard-anodization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I’m looking for a cartoner that can fold a carton with a 5th panel for lip balm tube. We are looking for a speed around 60 - 100 units per minute with the option to glue or reverse tuck carton. Automatic feeding would be a nice feature to have. I have a drawing if necessary.</title>
		<link>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2011/02/i%e2%80%99m-looking-for-a-cartoner-that-can-fold-a-carton-with-a-5th-panel-for-lip-balm-tube-we-are-looking-for-a-speed-around-60-100-units-per-minute-with-the-option-to-glue-or-reverse-tuck-carton/</link>
		<comments>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2011/02/i%e2%80%99m-looking-for-a-cartoner-that-can-fold-a-carton-with-a-5th-panel-for-lip-balm-tube-we-are-looking-for-a-speed-around-60-100-units-per-minute-with-the-option-to-glue-or-reverse-tuck-carton/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 18:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daphne</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Bahr]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[automatic feeding]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cartoner]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/?p=607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, my company, MGS Machine, does make such a machine. I must admit, to be fair, there are other firms that do as well. Most firms that produce cartoners for the personal care market will meet your basic  requirements as outlined.
Automatic feeding is an area that may help you distinguish the better firms from the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pmpn.canon-experts.com/2011/02/i%e2%80%99m-looking-for-a-cartoner-that-can-fold-a-carton-with-a-5th-panel-for-lip-balm-tube-we-are-looking-for-a-speed-around-60-100-units-per-minute-with-the-option-to-glue-or-reverse-tuck-carton/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

